Talking Points About Academic Integrity and AI
Different professors may allow limited use of Generative AI tools with proper citation, or accept its use on a case-by-case basis. It is up to the instructor to decide if and to what extent AI will be used in a course. Students much check with their instructor prior to using AI tools.
Why is it important to cite sources?
Considering the points above, researchers should be aware of the following considerations. ChatGPT...
- May generate citations for sources that do not exist.
- May be unable to provide specific sources of information or citations for the information it shares in a response to a query; its responses come from across a vast corpus.
- The platform is only as good as the information it draws from, and the current ChatGTP 3.5 (free) platform was released in 2021; the free version is already a few years old. It also may contain contradictory, biased, or false information.
Example: Upon asking ChatGPT to provide an annotated bibliography on the topic of residential care options for adults with autism, it provided a list with four citations and well-worded annotations. Although they all included real journal titles with corresponding volumes and issues, none of the article titles, authors or pagination matched any of the journals they were listed within. These were fabricated citations.
Example: Upon asking ChatGPT to provide an outline for the topic described above, it gave the response below. It is sometimes unable to explain where information came from or refer to specific sources:
"As for my source of information, I am an AI language model, and I generate my responses based on a vast amount of knowledge that I have been trained on."
Further Reading
"Using AI to Write Scholarly Publications," by Hosseini, Rasmussen, and Resnik. In Accountability in Research.
This article provides an academic discussion on the issues with using artificial intelligence tools to write scholarly publications.